Rereading George's letters from the start is an old habit.
In 1967/68 when I was a student in Paris and he was the tutor back in Sussex, I read his letters in the kitchen, eight sides of taut black biro. 'Is that a novel?' asked the maid as I sat in the kitchen turning pages, rapt, au pair no longer, understanding little and everything. Dear Mr Craig, Dear Judy. He was attracted by certain directions of my mind, he said, he hoped for a Central Honesty in our letters, so he released us from the roles of serene advisor at home and eager young mind abroad and conferred on me the status of Real Person. This was a piece of life in the wrong order. I could scarcely remember what George Craig looked like. Wasn't this what I'd always missed without knowing it, innerness with another person, to release the unknown into its own land, on the page.
At the same time I was living my life; after the au pair job I was une pomme verte in a flat with two German journalists, the cuban flag flying from the balcony, a red telephone on the floor: le ciel m'appelle, le ciel. The journalists trashed my self-absorption, stripped me down like an onion or an artichoke. I gave nothing, they said, but they liked my red dress hanging on the wall. I was teaching, I was reading, learning, in french, what I was unable to say in any language, separating fantasy from dream and then letting them coalesce again. George became, in our letters, the level that guaranteed my life, my (non) understanding. I dreamt of looking over George's shoulder at a letter he'd written which I couldn't quite read. He dreamed of a plateau on which we did a dance in front of the assembled School of European Studies. In another part of the universal university, economists were working so I could live this way.
We may not be the same person, he said, but we are equal, he followed his thought in great rushed painstaking arcs of apology, he only knew what he thought when he'd written it, I was lyrical, he was analytical, he said, I was a writer, he said. Do people know what they say as they say it? Is all the above a subset of beauty, lust, yearning and endless receptivity? Reading George's letters, then and now, following the leaps and rests of his thought, is a rare exercise in reading. He was an exhaustive, apologetic writer, diffident as an Irishman can be. Sometimes the arc of thought is so extended it's hard to stay with it; then you land, and find George there too, laughing.
That makes two heavily ego-centric tirades from me to you; if you listen carefully you should hear the last All Clear. The spotlights fade and Jupiter is heard speaking in a normal, almost human voice. The Girl, bewildered and slightly resentful, watches him with a mixture of ....
The last time I saw George was in Brighton Station in the early 80s, under a banner that read WRITE LETTERS: LETTERS ARE BETTER. I lived in Ireland by then, where George had grown up, a very ordinary Irishman, he said. I thought there might be more like him in Ireland, but of course there weren't. Similar bone structures now and then, but not this sensibility that found and brought out my own. Our letters between Sussex and Ireland take on another tone altogether because by then I kept copies of letters I sent, so I have both sides of the correspondence. Less literature, more life, more equal, different players in the same play.